Polygraph tests are very intriguing tests that are used to determine whether a person is telling the truth or not by answering a series of questions, dependent on the examiner. Examiners have all the power to decide how a polygraph test goes. And there are some of them who misuse this power.
Here are five different cases where polygraph examiners misused their powers and were arrested for fraud. If you’re looking for reliable polygraph services, contact us at (405)-434-5746.
Introduction
Lie detector tests are an evaluation used to determine whether a person is telling the truth or not. And they are measured through different physical behaviours. The polygraph test questions are set up by an examiner. But there are some moments when these examiners were fraudulent for their personal reasons. Here are five cases that are worth talking about.
Norbert Taylor’s Case
Starting off, we will be talking about Norbert Taylor’s case, and it’s definitely one to discuss. He was the examiner of a polygraph test. He faced arrest for tampering with the results of a polygraph test. When interrogated, it happened that he did this because he wanted to continue the very good records from the polymer test.
Some say it’s a matter of his ego. This made a mess with the results of the tests, as they didn’t want exposure for incompetence. Instead of messing with the results, it would’ve been better for him just to accept a little dent in their good record and then work on fixing it.
Case Where Examiner Faced Pressure from External Parties
There have been many cases in which the examiner of the polygraph faced pressure to change the results of the tests by external parties. There are different reasons why this happens, but it’s most often for selfish reasons and personal gain.
The examiner faces pressure from other agencies, authorities, and multiple organizations to give outcomes that favour a particular notion or narrative. It’s a very unethical and systematically immoral thing to do. And any examiner caught doing that stands to face the consequences.
Case Where the Examiner Lacked Expertise
There have been many cases where the examiners of polygraph tests faced suspension and apprehension for changing the results of a polygraph test, and the worst part of it all is the fact that they tampered with these results simply because they didn’t know what they were doing, as they didn’t have what it took to be a proper examiner.
The lack of skill and adequate knowledge on polygraphs and how to use them made them feel the need to tamper with results. They appeared to be professionals, but they had no idea what they were doing. And of course, many faced arrest for these actions.
Case of Issuing Fake Exams for Financial Gains
This case in particular is fascinating. Jason Norman, a polygraph examiner, made headlines for giving out fake exam results to people who took the test.
Many individuals paid him a large amount of money to change their results. And he saw it as a profitable business, but the issue with that is that it was totally illegal. He cashed out a crazy amount of money during this period, and he got sloppy. Then came his arrest by the authorities. Many people caught doing this did it mainly to make money for themselves.
The Case of David Edward
The final case we will be talking about today is David Edward’s. An examiner faced arrest for delivering fake test results of a polygraph test. The craziest part of it all, it was not for financial gains or pressure from external parties. Rather, for a personal agenda to achieve. The murderer of one of his friend’s children took the lie detection tests.
Because of his anger and hatred towards the person, he falsified the test results to put himself in his favour. It came to light that the results were fake, and he faced arrest soon afterwards. It’s essential for the right officials to always make routine checks on their examiners.
Conclusion
Always check and evaluate, if polygraph test examiners when in the position to work as examiners. There should be a full background check on all their characters before putting them in a position of responsibility, and a polygraph test. Note that, as an examiner, caught mishandling test results, you would face the full consequences, including arrest.
