Welcome to Sneaky Cat Private Investigations & Process Serving for our new subscribers. For our old subscribers, welcome back. I’m Makayla, and today Fraud Private Investigators will be joining us to Share 5 Times Polygraph Examiners Got Arrested for Fraud for Lying About Lie Detector Test Results. Keep watching if you want to find out. Don’t forget that for the best professional polygraph examination services in Oklahoma, you can reach out to us at (405)-434-5746 and you will not regret it.
Introduction to the case
Polygraph tests, which are popularly known as lie detector tests, are used to find out the truth. It is used by people for criminal investigations, employment screenings, and even national security. But there are situations where the polygraph examiners themselves lie. We will be talking about 5 instances where polygraph examiners were arrested for lying about lie detector test results.
1. Fake Test for Money
The first polygraph examiner on the list is Jason Norman. He was arrested for the fake test results he gave his clients. He usually falsified test results because of the financial gain he received. Some people who were to be administered the lie detector tests will pay him to alter the test results for their benefit. He made so much money from it and did so for over twenty cases until he was caught and arrested. Most polygraphists who have been caught in Oklahoma for proving fake lie detector test results often claim that it was the financial gain that pushed them.
2. The Personal Bias or Agenda
David Edward is the second polygraphist on our list who was arrested for a fraudulent test result. His was not caused by financial gain but because of the personal bias and stake he had in the outcome of the case. A friend’s daughter was murdered, and when he was asked to carry out a lie detector test on the alleged murderer, he did not disclose his interest in the case. He assumed the individual was the murderer, and that affected how he interpreted the lie detector test results to support the ideology or theory that the accused was the murderer. It was discovered later. This case shows how important it is to ensure that a polygraph examiner has no vested interest in a case where they are conducting a polygraph examination.
3. The pressurized Polygrapgher
As fraud private investigators, in the course of our investigations we have come across polygraph examiners who may have been pressurized into providing inaccurate or fraudulent lie detector test results. These polygraph examiners may feel pressure from employers, law enforcement agencies, other authorities, and even the media if the case in which the lie detector tests are taken has garnered public attention to produce results that support a particular narrative or outcome. For polygraph examiners in Oklahoma who cannot handle this pressure, they may succumb and manipulate or falsify the lie detector test results to produce a particular outcome that is unethical. When the pressurized polygraph examiners were discovered, they were still arrested irrespective of their explanations because they acted unethically.
4. The Lack of Expertise Case
There have been instances where a polygraph examiner who was arrested for lying about lie detector test results was unintentionally guilty. The inaccurate test results they presented were because they lacked expertise and training in polygraph examination. This led to these individuals misinterpreting the lie detection test results. Some of them posed like they were experts, and when they were unable to accurately interpret test results, they manipulated the test results to cover up their incompetence. Alicent Craig is one of these polygraph examiners who falsified lie detector test results because they lacked the expertise to interpret them.
5. The Case of Infated Ego
Norbert Taylor is a polygraph examiner who was arrested for falsifying a lie detector test result. His was caused by his inflated ego of maintaining their stellar or perfect track record. When they misinterpreted the test result, instead of coming clean about their error, they falsified the results to cover up. In the end, his error was discovered, which still tarnished the professional reputation he tried so hard to save.
Conclusion
‘With these five instances, there’s proof that polygraph exams aren’t foolproof, and neither are the polygraph examiners who administer them. You just have to stay skeptical, informed, and safe when opting for lie detector tests. At Sneaky Cat Private Investigations & Process Serving, we know that you want to hire the best polygraph examiner for your le detection test. So, reach out to us, and you will not regret it. You can get more insights into our services by checking our website at www.oklahomaprivateinvestigations.com. Do well to contact us at Keefe@PrivatelnvestigatorOKC.com or (405)-434-5746 and we will help you immediately Until next time, please stay alert and safe.
